2012年1月9日星期一

Starbucks Competitors Website

Vienna Coffee Co.
• The layout is clear, manage by section.
• Bad content arrangement, too pack when everything comes together.
• Bad typeface, too much words without a focus point.
• Too many fonts in 1 website.
• Outdated curly floral graphic and bad color combination.
• Inconsistent font size in every subtitle.




San Francisco Coffee
• Oversized content arrangement, out of grid and looks messy.
• No focus point, the font size of the content's title should be bigger.
• Too reddish, eyes hurt after seconds.• Bad navigation bar treatment and graphic.
• Didn't update frequently.




Blenz Coffee
• Clean neat and clear layout.
• Well arranged of contents.
• Font size for content typeface is too small, should be bigger.
• Navigation bar design can be improve. 
• Nice navigation bar's subtitle arrangement, simple yet well-navigated.
• Overall design can't really blend in with the logo. Should stick more to logo's color. Too vibrant and contrast for current combination.





Bello Mondo Coffee
• Bad website :|





Perk's Coffee
• Clean and clear website without scrolling bar.
• Good arrangement of content with simple grid system.
• Art direction can be further develop since the pictures and overall mood brings out a classy feeling, the background color grab everything back and makes everything lose a little.
• Good navigation to all of the sub-content.




SPR Coffee
• Like the art direction, bring out class and casual mood and feel.
• Simple, informative contents, clean layout, and not confusing grid system.
• Weird navigation system, shouldn't add new tab for every click on the navigation.
• Like the overall feeling.




SPR Coffee
• Weird art direction, looks like moon-cake website more than a coffee seller website.
• Ugly navigation bar.• Good content arrangement.
• Good to view since it's a long wide layout design without scrolling bar.
• Informative.


没有评论:

发表评论